What does the talmud say about jesus

6.75  ·  9,353 ratings  ·  288 reviews
what does the talmud say about jesus

Jesus in the Talmud by Peter Schäfer

Scattered throughout the Talmud, the founding document of rabbinic Judaism in late antiquity, can be found quite a few references to Jesus--and theyre not flattering. In this lucid, richly detailed, and accessible book, Peter Sch�fer examines how the rabbis of the Talmud read, understood, and used the New Testament Jesus narrative to assert, ultimately, Judaisms superiority over Christianity.


The Talmudic stories make fun of Jesus birth from a virgin, fervently contest his claim to be the Messiah and Son of God, and maintain that he was rightfully executed as a blasphemer and idolater. They subvert the Christian idea of Jesus resurrection and insist he got the punishment he deserved in hell--and that a similar fate awaits his followers.


Sch�fer contends that these stories betray a remarkable familiarity with the Gospels--especially Matthew and John--and represent a deliberate and sophisticated anti-Christian polemic that parodies the New Testament narratives. He carefully distinguishes between Babylonian and Palestinian sources, arguing that the rabbis proud and self-confident countermessage to that of the evangelists was possible only in the unique historical setting of Persian Babylonia, in a Jewish community that lived in relative freedom. The same could not be said of Roman and Byzantine Palestine, where the Christians aggressively consolidated their political power and the Jews therefore suffered.


A departure from past scholarship, which has played down the stories as unreliable distortions of the historical Jesus, Jesus in the Talmud posits a much more deliberate agenda behind these narratives.
File Name: what does the talmud say about jesus.zip
Size: 31888 Kb
Published 04.12.2018

Is the Talmud Anti-Christian?

Jesus In The Talmud

Scattered throughout the Talmud, the founding document of rabbinic Judaism in late antiquity, can be found quite a few references to Jesus--and they're not flattering. The Talmudic stories make fun of Jesus' birth from a virgin, fervently contest his claim to be the Messiah and Son of God, and maintain that he was rightfully executed as a blasphemer and idolater. They subvert the Christian idea of Jesus' resurrection and insist he got the punishment he deserved in hell--and that a similar fate awaits his followers. He carefully distinguishes between Babylonian and Palestinian sources, arguing that the rabbis' proud and self-confident countermessage to that of the evangelists was possible only in the unique historical setting of Persian Babylonia, in a Jewish community that lived in relative freedom. The same could not be said of Roman and Byzantine Palestine, where the Christians aggressively consolidated their political power and the Jews therefore suffered.

Jesus is the central figure of Christianity, believed by Christians to be the messiah, the son of God and the second person in the Trinity. While there is no archaeological or other physical evidence for his existence, most scholars agree that Jesus did exist and that he was born sometime in the decade before the Common Era and crucified sometime between CE the years when the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, ruled Judea. He lived at a time when the Roman Empire ruled what is now Israel and sectarianism was rife, with major tensions among Jews not only over how much to cooperate with the Romans but also how to interpret Torah. It was also, for some, a restive time when displeasure with Roman policies, as well as with the Temple high priests, bred hopes for a messianic redeemer who would throw off the foreign occupiers and restore Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel. By the first century, the view developed that the messianic age would witness a general resurrection of the dead, the in-gathering of all the Jews, including the 10 lost tribes , to the land of Israel, a final judgment and universal peace.

Or, as Chrysostom c. An evil contingent within the Jewish nation influenced the Romans to put Christ to death. No serious student of history can deny this reality. For nearly two millennia Jewish writers have been attempting to revise history in an effort to rationalize their role in the death of Jesus of Nazareth. In each attempt, they pitifully ensnare themselves. Better it would have been had they treated the awful history factually and simply moved on.

Who Was Jesus?

This is claimed to be a reference to Jesus. Ruth Nehemiah ; Talmud Kiddushin 70ba. Yochanan's statement. Rav Papa adds a parable to explain this.

No Jewish scholar can fail to recognize that the teaching of Jesus forms one of the most unique codes in the world. Joseph Klausner, for many years professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, states in his epoch-making book, Jesus of Nazareth, His Times, His Life and His Teaching , that in his ethical code there is a sublimity, distinctiveness and originality in form unparalleled in any other Hebrew ethical code. Although Dr. Klausner admits distinctiveness and originality in the teaching of Jesus, he did not succeed in liberating himself from the general contention that this teaching has its basis in rabbinic literature. It cannot be denied that there exists a striking similarity between some of the teachings of Jesus and those of certain rabbis. But what basis is there for saying that it was Jesus and not the rabbis who indulged in plagiarism?

2 thoughts on “Jesus in the Talmud by Peter Schäfer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *